Mandan, north dakota — a morton county jury of nine reached a verdict in energy transfer’s meritless lawsuit against greenpeace entities in the us (greenpeace inc, greenpeace fund), and greenpeace international, finding the entities liable for more than us$660 million, today. Mandan, north dakota — a morton county jury of nine reached a verdict in energy transfer’s meritless lawsuit against greenpeace entities in the us (greenpeace inc, greenpeace fund), and greenpeace international, finding the entities liable for more than us$660 million, today. A north dakota jury on wednesday found greenpeace liable for millions of dollars in damages to a giant pipeline company in relation to protests against the dakota access pipeline nearly a decade ago.
Jury finds Greenpeace at fault for protest damages, awards pipeline
The case centers on greenpeace’s involvement in protests against the dakota access pipeline in 2016 and 2017.
In total, the pipeline corporation asked the jury to award over $800 million.
During the trial, energy transfer partners sought to hold greenpeace liable for $75.7 million in direct damages from the protests, plus an additional $60.1 million the pipeline corporation expended on additional security. Other claimed damages included costs A north dakota jury on wednesday found greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests against the dakota access pipeline. The jury found greenpeace liable for damages exceeding $5 million.
The ruling was based on evidence of exaggerated claims and misleading information in greenpeace's campaign materials. Legal experts suggest this decision could set a precedent for future cases involving advocacy groups. (ap) — environmental group greenpeace must pay more than $660 million in damages for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests against the dakota access oil pipeline’s construction in north dakota, a jury found march 19. Jury finds greenpeace at fault for protest damages, awards pipeline developer more than $660 million by:
Greenpeace representatives talk with reporters on wednesday, march 19, 2025, outside the morton county courthouse in mandan, n.d.
From left are greenpeace usa interim executive director sushma raman, greenpeace usa senior legal adviser deepa padmanabha, greenpeace international general counsel kristin casper, greenpeace usa attorney everett jack jr., greenpeace fund inc. A north dakota jury found greenpeace liable for over $650 million in damages related to dakota access pipeline protests held in 2016 and 2017, as reported by the new york times. Energy transfer filed the lawsuit against greenpeace, alleging the organization led a misinformation campaign and engaged in militant direct action against the pipeline The recent jury verdict that awarded millions against greenpeace has sparked widespread debate and discussion across the globe.
This landmark case highlights th Free speech and right to protest on the line in the united states. Mandan, north dakota — a morton county jury of nine reached a verdict in energy transfer’s meritless lawsuit against greenpeace entities in the us (greenpeace inc, greenpeace fund), and greenpeace international, finding the entities liable for more than us$660 million, today. Jury decides greenpeace should pay more than $660 million in damages to energy transfer partners for defamation, trespassing and other illegal actions involving protests against the pipeline.
The jury’s verdict not only challenges greenpeace financially but also sends a stark warning to other environmental groups about the potential consequences of engaging in activism against large energy projects.
Greenpeace has indicated plans to appeal the decision, emphasizing the critical nature of their advocacy work and the implications of The damages total nearly $666.9 million. The jury found greenpeace usa must pay the bulk of the damages, nearly $404 million, while greenpeace fund inc. And greenpeace international would each pay
Energy transfer estimated the damages awarded at nearly $700 million. A jury verdict form with the exact total was not immediately available. The case centers on greenpeace’s involvement in protests against the dakota access pipeline in 2016 and 2017. On wednesday, the jury awarded the pipeline company hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
Greenpeace says the total judgment, approximately $660 million, could significantly damage the
“it is our collective assessment that the jury verdict against greenpeace in north dakota reflects a deeply flawed trial with multiple due process violations that denied greenpeace the ability to present anything close to a full defense,” a group of attorneys that monitored the proceedings said in a joint statement wednesday afternoon. A north dakota jury awarded energy transfer hundreds of millions in damages, ruling against greenpeace for its role in pipeline protests. Greenpeace called the lawsuit a slapp case, warning of threats to free speech, but jurors sided with energy transfer’s claims. The dakota access pipeline has
Native american protestors and their supporters are confronted by security during a demonstration against work being done for the dakota access pipeline (dapl) in north dakota in 2016. Greenpeace, one of the groups protesting dapl, was sued by the company building the pipeline. A jury has ordered greenpeace to pay millions of dollars. After two days of deliberations, a jury in north dakota state court decided on wednesday that greenpeace owes $660 million in damages to pipeline giant energy transfer, controlled by billionaire
A north dakota jury on wednesday found greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests against the dakota access pipeline.
Jury finds greenpeace liable over dakota pipeline protests, awards $660 million | north dakota | thecentersquare.com The damages total nearly $666.9 million. The jury found greenpeace usa must pay the bulk of the damages, nearly $404 million, while greenpeace fund inc. And greenpeace international would each pay
Free speech and right to protest on the line in the united states.
